M'sia Issued Sukuk Worth RM6.4 Bln In First Quarter

Bernama:Malaysia has issued sukuk worth RM6.4 billion in the first quarter of this year, with three large issues of between RM1 billion and RM2.5 billion, says Securities Commission chairman Datuk Seri Zarinah Anwar.

As a pioneer in the global sukuk market, Malaysia would continue to see growth trend in sukuk issues this year, she said...Read More

Demystifying Sukuk

IFSPOT: SUKUK ,An Emerging Asset Class.
By:Ibrahim Mardam-Bey CEO, Siraj Capital Ltd.Click here to view the Slides...

New sukuk seen topping $50bn in '09

Reuters:The issuance of sukuk, or Islamic bonds, is expected to pick up in 2009 and could exceed levels from 2007 after a dip this year, BNP Paribas' head of Middle East debt capital markets said.

Sukuk issues, which have fallen to around $14 billion this year, could pick up in the second quarter of 2009 and exceed last year's $50 billion figure as long as market conditions stabilise, Mark Waters told Reuters.

"The pipeline is very strong on both conventional and sukuk issuance for all market players," said Waters, speaking on the sidelines of a conference.

"I think you'll see a number of (Gulf) states, in particular Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, that will lean more heavily on sukuk structures than perhaps they would conventional bonds so I think those numbers are achievable."
Waters said an increase in the number of new bond issues in the US and European markets over recent weeks would help spur activity in the Gulf region.

Bond sales have almost dried up in the second half of this year as the global credit squeeze raised borrowing costs, prompting many Gulf borrowers to shelve sukuk sales as banks become more reluctant to lend.

Sukuks are designed to comply with an Islamic ban on the receipt of interest. Instead, returns are derived from underlying physical assets, such as property.

Process of sukuk issue needs to be reviewed

24/7 : Despite the sukuk industry being in its infancy, the current market developments showed the industry needs to re-evaluate the process of issuing sukuk, experts said.

They highlighted the need to create unified and integrated processes of issuing sukuk among different Islamic banks to help reduce costs.

"There are several legal issues related to sukuk issuance, especially compliance with Shariah principles, which requires the work of legal consultants and Shariah scholars. This is increasing the cost of issuing sukuk, compared to conventional bonds. We need to unify efforts of Islamic banks to agree on the main framework of issuing sukuk, while leaving room for innovation," said Khalid Al Saeed, Senior Director of Treasury at Saudi Arabia-based Samba Financial Group.

"Every religion has pluralism and the same is applied for Islam. There are different opinions and to achieve a unified structure of Islamic financial products, including sukuk, this will support the industry. We need agreement on documentation and legal areas concerning compliance of the genuine Islamic financial rules. However, we should leave some space for innovation in the industry," he told Emirates Business.

He stressed the sukuk market was still a very promising market that could add value to capital markets. "Unfortunately, the global financial crisis happened during the early stages in the sukuk industry, which led to a severe slowdown in sukuk issuance. We need now to re-evaluate issued sukuk and their performance as well as the whole industry before planning to expand after the crisis. Sukuk can unlock global markets and can introduce very promising asset class to the markets during this critical time."

Al Saeed voiced concern over the increasing trend towards Ijarah sukuk products, which are prominent in the market since the start of the credit crisis. "Most sukuk issues are going to Ijarah sukuk which are guaranteeing the return of investment by undertaking re-purchase at maturity deal. We should not focus on this area and we should go for Musharakah and Mudarabah sukuk that have more compliant with Islamic financial principles. Such contracts are compliant with Shariah principle, and also incorporate principles of benefiting both investors and issuers. Sukuk should not be a mimic of traditional bonds and they should have their true identity.

Mark Waters, Head of Debt of Capital Markets in the Middle East at PNB Paribas, expected that the sukuk market would return to function during the second half of 2009. "The decline in sukuk industry is a functional reaction to the credit crunch. The market dynamics are very weak and there are no investors interested in buying these products. When market confidence returns, the GCC market will return, but the fist half of 2009 will continue to decline. The market may return during the second half of 2009. Also, investors want to see a constant approach to the sukuk industry, especially to avoid differences and increase transparency."

Decree cripples sukuk market

Business Times:The fastest growing part of the global bond market is faltering and it has nothing to do with subprime mortgages or the credit crunch.

Sales of syariah-compliant debt, which financed Dubai's Palm development, the world's largest man-made island and where David Beckham and Donald Trump have homes, fell 50 per cent in 2008 and prices dropped an average 1.51 per cent, according to HSBC Holdings plc index data.

The so-called sukuk market, which has doubled each year since 2004 and grown to US$90 billion (US$1 = RM3.43), is declining after a Bahrain-based group of Islamic scholars decreed in February that most bonds ran afoul of religious rules. Only one that complies with the edict has been issued, pushing up borrowing costs on projects including US$200 billion of real-estate developments in the United Arab Emirates capital.

"In times of distress, the first thing investors sell are the credits they don't fully understand," said James Milligan, Dubai-based head of Middle East fixed-income trading at HSBC, the biggest underwriter of sukuk bonds in the Gulf last year.

"This has hit spreads hard in the region," he said, referring to the relative level of the Islamic bonds' yields.

The bonds satisfy Islam's ban on interest by allowing investors to profit from the exchange of assets, rather than money. Sales of the debt fell to US$11 billion from January to August, from US$21 billion in the same period of 2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. They peaked at US$38.6 billion last year, growing from virtually nothing six years earlier, the International Monetary Fund said. The decline in prices is worse than the 1.25 per cent drop in US corporate bonds, HSBC data show.

Banks sell sukuks by using assets to generate income equivalent to interest they would pay on conventional debt. The money can't be used to finance gambling, guns or alcohol.

The Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions ruled in February that bonds don't meet religious requirements if they haven't transferred ownership of collateral to holders. About 85 per cent of sukuks failed this test, the board said.

The judgment meant the value of the underlying collateral may decline amid falling real-estate prices, rather than being paid at face value in a default as in a conventional asset-backed securitisation. Sukuks are traded on exchanges in financial centres including Bahrain, Dubai and Malaysia.

As demand for Islamic-compliant bonds waned, yields rose to 2.94 percentage points more than the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, near a record and compared with 2.43 percentage points for an equivalent non-Islamic bond, Bloomberg data show. The spread was 1.08 percentage point a year ago and about double that in February.

"I wouldn't add anything to our ruling," said Sheikh Muhammad Taqi Usmani, chairman of the accounting board and a retired justice of the Pakistan Supreme Court.

"We're just pronouncing what's compliant to syariah and what's not," said Usmani, who advises HSBC, Dow Jones and Co Inc, the Central Bank of Bahrain and the Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector.

The ruling was intended to introduce "unified rules" to the market, said Mohamad Alchaar, secretary-general of the board, whose rulings are binding in six Arab countries.
Sorouh Real Estate Co, Abu Dhabi's third-biggest property company, sold four billion UAE dirham (100 UAE dirham = RM95.68) of bonds on August 13, the first sukuk that's "fully compliant" with the syariah board's ruling, according to Robin Ward, a director of structured finance at arranger Citigroup Inc.

Citigroup's panel of syariah scholars in London is led by Sheikh Nizam Yaquby, former chairman of the Bahrain-based accounting board. Yaquby, who advises about 40 financial institutions on Islamic financing rules, declined to comment when contacted by Bloomberg News.

"This is a true Islamic sale," said Ward. "You need a tangible asset and in this case, we had a freehold of land. There's no recourse back to the originator, which is the way previous sukuks have been done."

The clincher for getting the board's approval, said Ward, was transferring ownership of the underlying asset when the bonds were sold. The bulk of the debt paid interest of 200 basis points more than the one-month Emirates interbank offered rate, according to Citigroup.

"In essence, the previous sukuk structure was replicating a western bond where you get your money back and that's it," said Majid Dawood, chief executive officer of Yasaar Ltd, a Dubai- based consultancy that advises Paris-based Societe Generale SA, Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc in Edinburgh and Dublin-based Bank of Ireland plc.

More than half a trillion dollars in worldwide credit writedowns and losses squeezed lending in the Mideast as the Dubai Financial Market Real Estate Index of property-related stocks dropped 19 per cent since January. Morgan Stanley analysts predict a 10 per cent decline in property prices by 2010.

"The sukuk market has been very tough this year," said Kuala Lumpur-based Nor Hanifah Hashim, who manages about US$1 billion in an Islamic fund at CIMB, the world's largest underwriter of the debt. "People are adjusting to the new rules and you need to have very good quality of assets to attract investors."

Most issuers are still able to sell non-Islamic debt. Mideast companies raised US$50 billion this year in loans, compared with US$73 billion during the same period of 2007, Bloomberg data show.

Elaf-Algebra launch $100m Sukuk Fund

Gulf Daily News: Bahrain-based Elaf Bank and Algebra Capital have announced the launch of The Sukuk Fund. Targeting an initial size of $100 million and returns above eight per cent, the open-ended fund seeded by Elaf Bank and managed by Algebra Capital will provide exposure to Sharia-compliant securities issued in the Middle east North Africa and Asia region (MENASIA).

Elaf Bank will also serve in an advisory capacity on the fund's investment committee.

"The Sukuk Fund is an attractive vehicle to gain exposure to and benefit from the rapidly evolving and attractive Sukuk asset class capitalising on Elaf Bank's access to and expertise in Islamic finance and benefiting from Algebra Capital's investment process and extensive MENA research capability," said Elaf Bank chief executive officer Dr Jamil Jaroudi.

"We are launching this now because we can see value on the market. This is our first fund but we will be coming to the market with others in the future.

""By launching The Sukuk Fund, we hope that it will be considered by investors as a unique financial product providing diversification for their portfolios through the addition of Sharia-compliant income generating issues."

"The global sukuk market now exceeds $100 billion and the MENA region's contribution to it is expected to continue," said Algebra Capital managing director and portfolio manager Mohieddine Kronfol.

"MENA sukuk now represents 33pc of the global sukuk market and a little more than 33pc of MENA corporate fixed income issues. Strong economic fundamentals, large infrastructure projects and increasing capital market activity support and advance prospects for the Sukuk market in our region."

He said the sukuk market has grown dramatically over the past three years.

"There is now much more liquidity in the sukuk market and a lot more secondary trading and this is going to continue to increase."

"We are very happy to be launching and managing The Sukuk Fund, and on working with Elaf Bank," said Algebra Capital founder and chief executive officer, Ziad Makkawi.

"This will be the second fund managed by Algebra Capital in its fixed income line of business. The Sukuk Fund reflects both our constructive view of the region's fixed income markets as well as the importance of the Sharia-compliant space to us."

Elaf Bank was established in June 2007 with a paid-in capital of $200m and an authorised capital of $500m.

The bank's primary focus is to originate, structure and offer financial products that will strengthen the current state of the primary and secondary market for sukuk.

Sukuk costs to drop

Islamic bonds are set to get cheaper for issuers in the Gulf as growing demand for sukuk in the corporate sector spurs competition in the market, Standard & Poor's said on Tuesday.

Standard & Poor's said demand would likely be driven by Muslim countries as their capital markets developed and corporate borrowers sought a Sharia-compliant alternative to conventional debt.

"Past experience with debt instruments such as asset-backed securities, together with current market indicators, suggests that innovation and market demand for sukuk will continue to the extent that they evolve into a more commoditised asset class," said Mohammed Fayek, Standard & Poor's credit analyst.

"Furthermore, financial institutions will compete to capture this market segment and eventually narrow the pricing gap between sukuk and conventional instruments."

Standard & Poor's did not say how much the pricing gap would narrow or give a timeframe for this.

However, Standard & Poor's did caution that sukuk presented specific credit risks, particularly with regard to delays in scheduled payments, events of default, asset protection, structural issues and reporting standards.

The agency highlighted the GCC as one of the main regions driving growth in the Islamic bond market.

Listed sukuk on the Dubai International Financial Exchange (DIFX) amounted to about $16.1 billion at the end of 2007, up from $7.6 billion in 2006, it said.

Islamic bonds comply with the religion's ban on the receipt of interest, and returns derived from underlying physical assets, such as rent from real estate, are paid to bondholders.

Sukuk are usually more expensive for issuers than conventional bonds because it is a relatively new financial instrument and therefore issuers have to offer greater incentives to attract investors.

Sukuk's traditional base is in the banking and sovereign markets, but the growing interest in Sharia-compliant financial instruments has seen them expand into the corporate sector.

Recent action in the sukuk market includes the completion of a $875 million sukuk in early October by UAE-based Dana Gas, the announcement by another UAE firm, RAK Properties, that it intends to sell $2 billion of sukuk early this year, and Kuwaiti real estate firm Abyaar's announcement it will issue a $700 million sukuk early in 2008.

Islamic bond sales in Gulf countries could double to $50 billion in 2008 despite a global credit crunch, Morgan Stanley said in November.

Traditionally sukuk accounts for around 80% of all corporate bond issuances in the Gulf, but over the last year that share has been reduced to 57% with the growing popularity of conventional bonds, according to law firm Trowers & Hamlins.

Growing Interest in No-Interest Bonds(Sukuk)

JEDDAH, 20 January 2008 — The events of Sept. 11 raised the profile of all things Islamic. And now every major financial institution is quickly forming its own Shariah-compliant department.

Since 2001, the Islamic banking industry has boomed as more of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims seek financial services that comply with Islamic law, which bans interest. Islamic finance, instead, pays a return derived from underlying physical assets.

Seizing the opportunity, some 300 Islamic financial institutions are now spread among 75 countries compared with almost none 30 years ago, Kuwait’s Global Investment House (GIH) said recently in a report. And as economic developments go full blast, especially in oil-producing countries, something brought about by the quadrupling of oil prices in the last six years, the demand for cash — both by the investors and consumers — grows more intense.

Islamic financial services are gaining popularity that even conventional banks and financial institutions patronize. Gulf investors are also attracted by higher returns from Islamic finance over conventional banking, while Western investors are drawn to Islamic investment products as a way to diversify their portfolios, said the GIH report.

One of the much sought-after Shariah-compliant financial instruments is the Islamic bond, or sukuk. In finance, a bond means a debt paper in which the authorized issuer, usually banks or governments, owes holders a debt and are obliged to repay the paper at a later date, termed maturity. Bonds enable the issuer to finance long-term investments with external funds.

Hence, Islamic bonds are those that operate under Islamic rules. Sukuk are attractive, as they bring a new source of funds at a favorable rate, as they adhere to Shariah law.

As there is a great deal of surplus cash in Islamic institutions waiting to be tapped by new financial instruments, sukuk can allow this pot of gold to be unlocked.

Management consultants McKinsey & Co. in December predicted the assets held by Islamic banks would hit $1 trillion by 2010.

According to the latest GIH reports, the United Arab Emirates was the world’s top issuer of Islamic bonds during the last seven years, contributing 36.2 percent of global sale value. The world’s largest Islamic bond, worth $3.52 billion, was sold by Dubai property developer Nakheel in 2006.

Global sales of sukuk have surged during the past year due to greater demand from Muslims and from Western and Asian investors looking to tap Gulf economies that are booming.

Analysts say that Gulf-issued sukuk overtake their Malaysian counterparts amid a perception that the principles used to structure their products are not as stringent as in the Gulf. “Some sukuk structures are popularly accepted in Malaysia but not necessarily in other jurisdictions,” they said.

“One factor that is limiting sukuk issuance in Malaysia from growing substantially and acquiring a global investor base is the fact that most issues out of Malaysia are denominated in Malaysian ringgit due to tax incentives,” they added.

While Malaysia’s sukuk market is mainly domestic, foreign investors have bought as much as 80 percent of recent Gulf sales, which are generally denominated in dollars.

Corroborating the GIH report, Moody’s Investors Service said Gulf Arab sales of Islamic bonds overtook those in Malaysia for the first time, rising to $13.2 billion so far in 2007.

At the end of August last year, sales by governments and companies in the UAE, Bahrain and four other Gulf countries accounted for 55 percent of the global total for bonds that comply with Islamic law. That compared with $9.7 billion sold in Malaysia, Moody’s Middle East and Islamic Finance analyst Faisal Hijazi said earlier.

Malaysia, which along with the Gulf is one of the world’s Islamic banking hubs, came second, contributing 32.1 percent of Islamic bonds by value, though Malaysia issued far more individual bonds, it said.

“The Middle East, mainly the Gulf, is progressing quickly to become a global leader in the provision of Shariah-compliant sukuk structures and products,” Hijazi added.

However, at present there is a catch here blocking the growth of the Islamic financial industry.

The report said the main obstacles to the growth are a lack of awareness among Muslims of the products and services on offer, and a lack of standardization of the laws governing Islamic banks.

“Unless there is a general consensus among the major players of Islamic banking on creating a universally accepted set of regulations that are clear to the masses ... the popularity of this concept will become a lingering challenge,” said GIH.

Islamic Securitisation: Practical Aspects

Mr. Suleiman ABDI DUALEH

Introduction

The fact that Islamic institutions have a growing participation in the global securitization business is an affirmation of the success they have achieved during the last three decades. Since securitization is a recent invention in conventional financial practices, it is a considerable achievement for Islamic institutions to be involved with this new dynamic line of business. After all, they were until recently struggling to come up with a replacement for products as mundane as saving accounts.

In order to appreciate the importance of securitization to Islamic institutions, one must learn how securitization is commonly understood. Then, it is useful to proceed to highlight the specific concerns of Islamic institutions in the securitization process, and touch upon some limitations of Islamic institutions’ practices in securitization. Finally, it is worth elucidating some structures and comment on two case studies. Upon completion of this review, we will understand the importance and the future of Islamic institutions applying this financial method.

Definition

In defining securitization we focus on processes - the process of pooling assets, the process of packaging them into securities, and the process of distributing securities to investors. As Islamic institutions are more concerned with the Islamic acceptability of the securitization business, their focus is more on the content of the “package” rather than the process of packaging. Therefore, they tend to ensure that the assets in the package - and not the package alone - are Islamically acceptable.

A more specific definition characterises securitization as the process of packaging designated pools of assets with or without credit enhancement into securities, and the sale of these securities to the appropriate investors.

The process involves the creation of homogenous assets - both in kind and in underwriting criteria - and then pooling them into a significant saleable size. Generally, a pool, on the whole, has a better credit characteristic (through diversification of credit risk, transaction size, geography, etc.) than an individual asset. The process may also involve the provision of additional protection for the investors against late payments, pre-payments, potential write-offs, as well as cash-flow timing mismatches. Such protection is often provided in the form of credit and/or liquidity enhancement schemes, as will be explained later.


The Case for Securitization

Securitization is an American invention, but no longer remains an American curiosity. Almost all the major financial systems have certain securitization schemes. The sale of whole loans could be dated as far back as the 1880’s in the USA. The origins of secunitization of assets, however, is traced to the 1970’s when the Government National Mortgage Association (”GNMA”) developed the GNMA pass-through, a mortgage -backed security collateralized by single-family Federal Housing Administration (”FHA”) and Veterans Administration (”VA”) mortgage loans. Securitization grew into a significant business in the 1990’s.

Today, securitized assets not only include mortgages on properties, but also credit card receivables, computer leases, equipment notes financing, auto loans, and even future sales of music records. There was even an attempt to securitize the life insurance policies of people with full-blown AIDS, enabling them to monetize their polices. As one can observe, both Islamically permissible and impermissible assets are routinely securitized in the US and international financial markets.


The growth of securitization is basically driven by four factors; first, the imposition of capital adequacy ratios and reserve requirements on financial institutions by the regulatory agencies have made financial institutions safer place to invest in. But these restrictions have “costs” as they either add direct cost or restrict the ability of these financial institutions to increase their volume of business.

Securitization enables these institutions to efficiently remove assets from their balance sheet. It allows them to monetize previously illiquid assets, recycle cash to be reinvested and, hence, expand the volume of their business without a corresponding increase in their equity capital. In simple terms, securitization allows financial institutions to serve more customers without having to raise new funds in the form or either equity or deposits.

Second, whenever the global cost of capital increases, securitization helps financial institutions to raise cheaper capital for their businesses at the asset level instead of the enterprise level.

Third, there is a growing convergence of many capital markets into one, as the barriers between them were removed. As all segments of the economy now compete for the same capital, efficient, low cost of financing have become more necessary.

Fourth, increased ability to generate and utilise information through popular use of rapidly improving computer technology has resulted in significant gains for the securitization business. It is now possible to obtain credit and liquidity information on millions of financial assets, enabling the market players to isolate certain types of assets with the objective of making them self-financing.

The availability of information enables institutions to remove certain assets from their balance sheets and obtain better credit than what the originators could command in the market, and, hence, lower cost of funding.

These four trends have helped the growth of global securitization industrysince the 1980’s. By the end of 1994, the total volume of asset-backed securities issued in the USA and Europe alone exceeded 400 billion US dollars, a significant progress for a line of business that was largely unknown before the 1970s. As of this writing, the asset backed markets have blossomed to $ ? trillion despite the weak global economy.

The securitization process has also some specific benefits for Islamic institutions. As Islamic finance tends to relate finance to assets, asset backed securitization is the right product for Islamic institutions, as long as these assets are structured in accordance with Islamic principles. The concept of asset backing is prevalent in all other Islamically- structured transactions. For example, in trade finance we use “morabaha” contract, which enables the Islamic institutions to purchase certain goods and sell the same to a client at a pre-agreed profit margin, rather than giving an interest-bearing loan to the client, which then purchases the goods.

In project finance, we prefer to buy equipment and lease it to a project-promoter, instead of providing him with liquid capital against payment of interest. Therefore, the use of securitization will bring in much needed liquidity to these institutions, by enabling Islamic institutions to free part of their capital which is tied-up with these illiquid project and trade financing activities.


Word of caution

The question, therefore, is not whether Islamic banks should play a role in this dynamic market; it is the “how” which intrigues many market observers. But before we examine the mechanisms to be employed, we should, perhaps, drive home certain realities about Islamic institutions; realities that can sharpen their focus on this line business.

As Muslim-owned banking and non-banking entities, Islamic institutions conduct the major part of their business in the Muslim world. Being a regulation-driven process, securitization, however, is prevalent only in countries with developed regulatory framework i.e., the OECD countries like the United States and United Kingdom and a few emerging economies like Kuwait, Singapore and Malaysia.

While Islamic institutions, therefore, can easily securitize the assets they own in the most developed economies, they may not easily do the same with the bulk of their assets in the Muslim world. In addition, the successful use of securitization requires the availability of credit and financial information on the underlying assets, the existence of accounting standards, and the possibility of having some rating systems.

None of these conditions are satisfied in most of the Islamic countries. The only exception to this rule is where securitization is employed to raise funds for certain self-contained projects with guarantees from host governments, and with possible backing from international funding organisations, as has been implemented in recent years in countries like Turkey, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Egypt.

When I was at Faisal Finance (Switzerland) in the 1990’s or (”FFS”), we opted to use securitization to compliment our investments in real estate and equipment leasing operations in the USA. Through our involvement in securitizations, we have identified four main issues of concern to Islamic institutions:

- The type of asset must be acceptable to Islamic investors; 9 The structures to be used must be acceptable;
- A sufficient element of ownership must be conveyed to comply with Islamic principles governing asset sales and assignments; and
- Any form of credit enhancement must be in a permissible form..

The Assets

As securitization is established and developed primarily in non-Islamic economies, the assets typically included in securitized pools do not necessarily conform to Islamic norms. The assets in Western securitized pools are invariably interest-bearing debt instruments, such as credit card receivables, mortgages, etc. As Islam does not permit the use of interest, it is important for Islamic banks to originate their own Islamically acceptable assets, rather than buy pools of assets in the market.

They should therefore use securitization as a secondary tool to provide certain efficiencies to their own operations, and not as a primary business for servicing or underwriting transactions for third-party financial institutions and investors, which are probably non-Islamic in their investment practices. The latter course will invariably involve them in benefiting from restructuring non-halal assets into Islamically permissible investments. As Islam does not permit the payment or receipt of interest, the sale or purchase of debt instruments is not permitted.

unless this debt is interest-free and is sold on its face value, which is not the most profitable proposition for any organization.

For an Islamic institution, the underlying assets to be securitized will include leasing, equity ownership, and morabaha contracts. As explained earlier, these contracts may mimic inancings by trading or leasing assets and are Islamically acceptable. They are also applied to a wide range of industries, For example, leasing could be applied to funding the lease of equipment required by businesses, funding purchase of computer and cars by individuals, and funding the acquisition of homes by individuals, in effect replacing straight mortgages. In the latter case the ownership of the financed house remains with the financier but the house is leased back to the client with an option or a promise to buy out the house from the financier at a predetermined price at some future date. While the leasing law differentiates between operating and financial leases, this distinction is not very pertinent for Islamic scholars, and are all generally considered acceptable.

Alternatively in the housing case, an investor could share equity ownership with a consumer in a house, with a an agreement for the consumer to buy out the investor’s equity stake over a specific term at a mutually agreed price and profit. Similarly, morabaha contract could also be used for all the above, but the unsolved issues, including the Islamic restrictions on trading in debts or managing prepayment risk, may limit its use in securitization, but not syndication.

The Structures
In a securitization structure, the players include the originators, servicers, issuers, investment bankers, credit enhancers, rating agencies, and trustees. Originators originate the assets, but can also serve as the servicers, which are responsible for the management and maintenance of assets and the related cashflows. Assets are first sold to Issuers, which are bankruptcy-remote Special Purpose Vehicle (”SPV”). The SPV then issues securities, which are claims on the assets held by the issuer. Such claims carry a specific form of attachment to the ownership of the asset. When assets are not sold to an incorporated SPV, they are sold to a trust, which takes the form of either a guarantor trust or an owner trust. Trusts are created and managed by trustees for the benefit of beneficial owners. Investment bankers underwrite the securities for public offering or place them privately to institutional or wealthy investors, while rating agencies provide the necessary rating, based on certain recommended level of credit enhancement. Finally, the credit enhancers provide the required credit and/or liquidity enhancement, which could be a reserve fund from the asset’s cash flow or collateral pledged to support the asset or a guarantee, in order to obtain the required credit rating.

To obtain a reasonable degree of tax efficiency for non-US tax paying investors, it is invariably recommended for Islamic international investors investing in the USA, for example, to set-up their SPVs in a tax-free jurisdiction like the Channel Islands or in a country with a tax-treaty with the USA like Ireland or Luxembourg. The choice depends on the specific tax circumstances of the investor and the underlying asset and trust or SPV. Given the complexity of international tax issues, I recommend consulting with the propriate experts when structuring investment into the US or other jurisdictions with high taxes for foreign investors.
With this background, we may now specify the three main structures commonly used in securitization. The originators choose between three types of structures; pass-throughs, asset-backed bonds, and pay-throughs. These structures have been developed in the secondary mortgage and non-mortgage market.

A pass-through represents direct ownership in a portfolio of assets that are usually similar in terms of maturity, yield, and quality. The originator services the portfolio, makes collections, passes them on, less a servicing fee, to the investors. Ownership of the assets in the portfolio lies with the investors; thus, pass-throughs are not debt obligations of the originator and do not appear on the originator’s financial statement. Pass-throughs may also be designed to represent an assignment of a portion of ownership, rights and obligations, but not a conveyance of title. Sometimes complex tax or investor issues, and in many Islamic countries, rules restricting foreign ownership of locally domiciled assets require the partial assignment or sale without recordation.

Like the pass-through, the Asset-Backed Bond (”ABB”) is collateralized by a portfolio of assets, or sometimes by a portfolio of pass-throughs. The ABB is a debt obligation of the issuer, so the portfolio of assets used as a collateral remains on the issuer’s books as assets, and the ABBs are reported as a liability. Also, the cash flows from the collateral are not dedicated to the investors. They are often reconfigured, with the residual often remaining with the issuer/ originator.

One important aspect of the ABBs is that they are over-collateralized, i.e., the value of the underlying assets is significantly in excess of the total obligation. This is largely done in order to provide some level of comfort to the investors.

The pay-through bond, however, combines some of the features of the pass-through with some of those of the asset-backed bond. The bond is collateralized by a pool of assets and appears on the issuer’s balance sheet as debt. The cash-flow from the assets, however, are dedicated to servicing the bond in a way similar to the pass-throughs.

In addition to collateralized bonds and pay-through notes, commercial paper and preferred stock were also used in the past as alternative structures.

Of the above widely used securitization structures, the pass-through is perhaps the structure closest to satisfying a strict interpretation of Islamic principles. The pay-through, the ABB and the Commercial Paper are debt- structures, which make explicit use of interest. Therefore, only a pass-through with underlying pool of assets structured as morabaha, equity statkes or ijara, could facilitate Islamic institutions to expand their current activities in the securitzation business.

Having said that, it is also possible to use certain variations of a pay-through, which closely resemble the pass-through. We may have a pass-through with certain degree of credit enhancement for the investors as follows; [Suleiman - what was your example?]

Ownership Conveyance
The structures that I have discussed must, in order to comply with Sharia’a, transfer some minimum level of ownership. This is not necessarily registered title. It could be a rather simple collection of ownership attributes that allow the investor to step into the shoes of the issuer or co-owner and perform duties related to ownership. Likewise, these could also be rights granting access, subject to notice. Such access might result in curing a defect caused by the operator or issuer, or even result in the taking over operations by the investor. Such rights and obligations might ultimately empower the investor to take control of the asset and sell it outright into the market place. As we will see in our examples, the level of conveyance varies for practical reasons and our Scholars have asked us to observe a specific level of conveyance in order to avoid the deconstruction of asset investment into debt sale.

All three structures described above may result in the issuance of a number of documents that flow from lessee or home buyer, that is the recipient of the investment to the investor. These may include promissory notes, mortgages or security instruments, and various documents of conveyance or assignment. Generally, these have no bearing on the Islamic contract, assuming that they do not contradict it. For instance, there is no restriction in Sharia’a to promise to make specific payments as is required by a promissory note. But, there are customary judicial procedures that make it difficult for an investor to act against the holder of an asset if a promissory note does not exist. The same applies to security documents like chattel liens or mortgages. Even though the investor has some aspect of ownership, it the end customary procedures in many jurisdictions require the investor to hold a right of enforcement like a mortgage in order to secure legal satisfaction in a contentious case.

There is, however, a single dominant Sharia’a rule governing all documents, namely that they are conveyed together. In an interest bearing securitization, two securities might be derived from a single lease - a principal only instrument governed by the contract of lease and any security instrument, and an interest only instrument governed by the promissory note. This practice is not acceptable in Islamic investing, and an assignment of any document, contract, promissory note or security instrument, must be accompanied by all of the documents. In other words, Islamic institutions are not allowed to derive multiple instruments from one in a manner that creates either the sale of a debt, sale of an isolated cash flow, or a direct interest obligation.

Credit Enhancement
In an effort to obtain best pricing for the securities to be sold by the SPV to the investors, the originator in a traditional securitization chooses to issue two classes of securities, A and B, such that class A gets priority over class B on the payment priority scale. The originator retains security Class B, which is subordinate to class A. In this case, the SPV receives the total cash-flow attributable to both classes of securities and distributes the same in the order of priorities stipulated in the incorporation documents. This is normally done in order to secure a better rating for the Class A certificates, hence better pricing, which is supported by the cushion provided by Class B certificates.
Under Islamic securitization scheme, we can achieve the same objective by assigning the full ownership rights of the total assets in the pool to class A holders, but with a lease back agreement to lease to the issuer the entire portfolio with some fixed rental payments. The issuer also gets an option (or an obligation) to buy back the entire portfolio at a pre-determined prices on some future dates. Both the sale price and the rent are prefixed in order to ensure that the holders of class A certificate get a fair market value for the risks they took.

Another form of enhancement is for the issuer and servicer to set aside some of the asset cash flow that was allocated to them. This becomes a first loss pool, a form of self insurance for the asset pool if you like. In this case, no guarantee, insurance, or complicated buy back structure is required. Sometimes this is a very efficient form of enhancement as some rating agencies will dictate the size of the pool based on the past performance of similar assets, and to everyone’s surprise the level of funding is not excessive.

Securitization can also involve other types of credit enhancement such as the creation of spread accounts, bank letters of credit, pool insurance, mono-line insurance for up to 100% of the pool size or straight sub-ordination. We have also touched upon the issue of over-collateralization as provided in the pay-through structure.

Islamic institutions should be very selective in using the credit enhancement methods; the use of some of them changes the character of the transaction. For example, the existence of spread accounts for the excess cash implies the transaction was not a pass-through as the originator was able to keep certain undistributed cash over and above what was paid to the investors and administrators. The investors themselves can, however, willingly deduct part of their income in a reserve account, which is perhaps managed by the investors, to meet eventual losses, if any.

Likewise, the investors may also buy pool insurance, obtain a letter of credit, or blanket the pool with a mono-line insurance. There is nothing wrong with the use of these products as long as the investors are willing to buy them and have the choice to use or not to use them. Likewise, it is possible for the Islamic investors to use certain liquidity facility to cover any possible temporary shortfalls, due to mismatches in cash-flow timing, etc., as long as these facilities are arranged on terms acceptable to Islamic practices. Perhaps the best way to explain securitization is to take some case studies as follows;

Case Studies

In 1994, FFS undertook the securitization of a large Master Lease Investment in a single property in Boston, USA. The securitization was facilitated by the creation of a REMIC -Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit - to which the Master Lease was deposited. The securities were sold to a major insurance company in U.S.A., which was comfortable with the Master Leases characteristic of the underlying assets as against straight mortgage. The securities were issued in accordance with characteristics, which conform to the established norms of the business. These characteristics included the issuance of tranche B certificate retained by FFS by way of providing over collateralization for the buyer of the senior securities.

This over-collaterlization was achieved in accordance with the arrangements explained earlier in this presentation. Through the engineering of the deal, FFS was able to enhance its return on the underlying fixed-income asset by more than 1.25%, without changing its risk profile in the deal. In fact, with the underlying master lease being retired on an early basis, the enhancement of the early termination payments on the lease provided FFS with an internal rate of return of over 14%, net of fees. This was all established through securitization process. This also was the first U.S. securitization of an asset specifically originated on an Islamically acceptable basis.

In 1998, FFS utilised the new FASIT laws to pool more than $50 million of Master Lease assets into a trust. FASIT stands for Financial Asset Securitization Investment Trust; it is a type of trust established in the 1990’s under United States law, for use in pooling various types of assets in order to issue securities backed by those assets. The trust pool can be established with various types of assets.
In creating the FASIT, FFS originated assets from some of its sister organizations as well as from U.S. corporations. The assets consisted of Islamically acceptable Master Lease financings on properties.

The FASIT was set up with Crescent Capital (Jersey) Limited, an affiliate of FFS, as the depositor, contributing 13 assets, all Senior Master Lease financing on commercial building in the U.S. ranging in size from $2.5 -$8.5 million. The FASIT was engineered with three classes of securities, with the fast-pay amortizing class A being sold to a major insurance company, and the remaining other two classes held by an FFS affiliate.

This is consistent with the Islamic practices as we ensured that not only the underlying financial assets all conform to Islamic principles, but that the trust structure allowed investors to have ownership rights in the trust. The sub-ordinate classes were held by the issuer and not sold to other investors.

The FASIT allows for replacement of any asset (subject to approval rights), which will allow the equity owner of the property to be able to sell unencumbered so long as a suitable asset is available for replacement. The FASIT is designed to provide for all of the deals to achieve long-term permanent financing, but with the flexibility of pre-payment through the replacement mechanism. This is a great benefit to equity investors in the various FFS funds, which own the assets. The FASIT also provided a significant net capital gain on the sale of the securities.

The Freddie Mac process recently instigated in the US is another example of a securitization process. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. also called Freddie Mac has committed to expanding home ownership among a wide variety of US citizens deemed to be under housed. Freddie Mac’s research has shown Muslims to fall into that category. Initially, the program worked with ‘lease to own’ Islamic structures, but it is planned to include declining balance partnership structures like those employed by Guidance Residential, LLC.

In this process, the originator, a bank or mortgage bank invests in the property (sometimes using trusts and ometimes using SPV’s) either as sole owner or as co-owner. To facilitate US legal custom and comfort Freddie Mac, the consumer agrees to a form of note and the ownership of the property grants a security interest in the property. These together are then assigned to Freddie Mac, which may or may not hold them in its own portfolio or set up a special Islamic portfolio for international investors. Prior to the Freddie Mac commitment, Muslims paid huge premiums for mortgage alternative programs, up to 5% over the conventional market. Thanks to this new process, Muslim consumers face marginal differences in cost compared to conventional mortgage loans, but comply fully with Sharia’a.

Each of these examples is a distinct, but constructive live example of how Islamic institutions have used securitization for the benefit of both Muslim investors and consumers.

Conclusion

Since its debut in the early 1970’s, securitization has grown into a significant business, with credible players and definable rules. It is driven by enactment of various legislation, which made the widespread use of securitization possible. Securitization created net gains for the community as almost everybody gained something from the process. It reduced overall industry concentration risks, resulted in better transparency of operations, imposed industry bench-marks, created significant fee-income for originators and investment bankers, reduced cost of funding to businesses and consumers, and provided better returns for investors.

As information about pools of assets become more and more available -through moreextensive use of electronic information providers like the Internet, through deregulation of global financial markets, and as a result of on-going globalisation of banking and finance - it is envisioned that securitization business will only grow. The trend is also consistent with the growing demand for disintermediation in the financial markets, which is widely documented.

Islamic institutions, on the other hand, have all along promoted a philosophy in financing based on direct asset financing, rather than lending funds to entities and individuals. They have all along suffered from having to deal with financial intermediaries whose interest-based products are not Islamically acceptable. Securitization enables Islamic institutions to by-pass these shortcomings by engaging themselves directly with the assets to be financed, and with investors in the pools of these assets. It also enables Islamic institutions to negotiate the Islamic acceptability of the terms under which the users hold these assets.

Because of these benefits, we consider securitization as yet another venue for Islamic institutions to demonstrate their competitiveness and to broaden their markets.

www.islamicfinanceandbanking.blogspot.com

Japan picks Malaysia to issue first Sovereign Islamic Bonds

Hong Kong: Japan will issue its first sovereign Islamic bond, or sukuk, of $300-500 million in Malaysia next month, a senior official of the Japan Bank for International Co-operation (JBIC) has said.

“It will be issued after the Chinese New Year (on 7 February) and we hope it will be well-subscribed by the Gulf states,” said Tadashi Maeda, JBIC director-general for energy and natural resources finance department, here yesterday (15 January).
The government-backed JBIC is Japan’s biggest overseas lender.
The issue, the first by an institution from a major economy to tap capital from the oil-rich Muslim Gulf states, comes at a time when oil prices have soared to record highs.

Details of the issuance will be finalized close to a 23 February Islamic finance seminar in Japan to which Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz, the governor of Malaysia’s central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia, has been invited to make an address, Maeda said.
“We will finalize it around that time. We have studied this for a long time, as this is the first sovereign Islamic bond to be issued by Japan,” he said on the sidelines of a two-day Islamic finance seminar here organized by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Malaysia-based Islamic Fi nancial Services Board (IFSB).
Maeda said the bond will have a maturity of five to seven years.

Malaysia, a pioneer in Islamic finance with three decades of history, is the world’s biggest sukuk issuance centre with over $56 billion, or 62% of global sukuk issues.

SUKUK SALES JUMP 70% AS BORROWERS DEFY CREDIT MARKET BLUES

Islamic bond sales jumped 70% last year as borrowers led by Gulf Arab companies sidestepped the credit market slump triggered by record defaults on US home loans.
Global sales of so-called sukuk rose to $30.8bn, from $18.1bn in 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Borrowers in Gulf nations including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates sold $17.9bn of the securities, 75% more than last year.

“Most sukuk sales come from the Middle East and Asia, which are firing on all cylinders while the US and Europe are hampered by the subprime crisis,” Arul Kandasamy, Dubai-based head of Islamic finance for Barclays Capital, said in a phone interview from Malaysia yesterday. “It’s also a much newer market that’s been showing explosive growth for about three years.”

Saudi Electricity Co, the kingdom’s largest power producer, and Aldar Properties PJSC, Abu Dhabi’s biggest property developer, were among companies selling sukuk for the first time, spurred by economic growth as oil prices soared.

In the European bond market, sales fell by 1% from 2006, their first decline since 2000, after companies abandoned plans as borrowing costs jumped to a five-year high.
HSBC Holdings, the biggest manager of sukuk sales worldwide this year after Malaysia-based CIMB Bhd, in October started the first index of Middle East corporate bonds, including Islamic securities.

Trading in regional debt jumped more than fourfold in the first half as overseas investors were attracted to the market, according to Neil Foster, HSBC’s head of global markets for the Middle East.

Nakheel, business park operator Jebel Ali Free Zone FZE and the Ras al-Khaimah Investment Authority were among UAE sellers of Islamic bonds in the second half

KUWAIT'S KFH LAUNCHES FIRM TO TRADE ISLAMIC BONDS

Kuwait Finance House (KFH), the country’s biggest Islamic lender, said on Monday it had launched a firm to trade Islamic bonds, or sukuk, on the secondary market. The firm would have a capital of KD100 million ($366.2 million) and issue and trade sukuks with the goal of creating a secondary market for Islamic bonds in Kuwait, KFH said in a statement after the firms’ first general assembly. “For the first half of 2008, the firm plans to issue sukuks,” it said in a statement. Islamic law bans the receipt of interest, and sukuk are typically based on physical assets that pay a return to bondholders. They were often bought when they were issued on the primary market and held to maturity because they were so scarce. But a surge in sukuk sales this year and strong demand from Western buyers has transformed the once stagnant secondary market in the Gulf into an increasingly active and liquid one, bankers told Reuters in August.

Creation
Meanwhile, Kuwait Finance House (KFH) announced Monday creation of a Beit for Management of Investment Liquidity and elected a board of director for the new firm headed by Imad Youssef Al-Mani’e. The firm, which specializes in management of Islamic bonds, is the first of its kind, Al-Mani’e said in a press briefing here. With KD 100 million capital, the company help create a subsidiary market for bonds. It will serve as a new financing tool, thus serving the Kuwaiti investment market, Al-Mani’e pointed out. The establishment of the company is in line with the government tendency to turn Kuwait into a global financial hub, he noted.

It expresses the KFH major role in the Sharia-based financial transactions, he added. The bond market in Kuwait saw a remarkable progress in the last three years and still has promising potentials. Through launching Beit for Management of Investment Liquidity, the KFH made a qualitative move to encourage more firms to issue bonds, and enhance the investment tools based on Sharia (Islamic law), he added. Established in Kuwait in 1977, KFH is the first bank operating in accordance with Shari’a. It was listed on Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE) on Dec 31, 2006 with a capital of KD 3.133 billion.